When the media began reporting on allegations of sexual abuse
by a former Penn State football coach, University President Graham Spanier issued a tone deaf response.
It prioritized two senior university executives instead of eight boys who were reportedly molested and serves as a perfect example of how not to react in a crisis. Spanier may lose his job over his role in this scandal, and the local newspaper, the Patriot-News
, has already called for his resignation
It’s fair to say the university’s crisis communications effort got off to a disastrous start.
But on Tuesday night, the university’s Board of Trustees released a near-perfect statement
that should serve as a model for other organizations entangled in crisis.
Statement by The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
The Board of Trustees of The Pennsylvania State University is outraged by the horrifying details contained in the Grand Jury Report. As parents, alumni and members of the Penn State Community, our hearts go out to all of those impacted by these terrible events, especially the tragedies involving children and their families. We cannot begin to express the combination of sorrow and anger that we feel about the allegations surrounding Jerry Sandusky. We hear those of you who feel betrayed and we want to assure all of you that the Board will take swift, decisive action.
At its regular meeting on Friday, November 11, 2011, the Board will appoint a Special Committee, members of which are currently being identified, to undertake a full and complete investigation of the circumstances that gave rise to the Grand Jury Report. This Special Committee will be commissioned to determine what failures occurred, who is responsible and what measures are necessary to insure that this never happens at our University again and that those responsible are held fully accountable. The Special Committee will have whatever resources are necessary to thoroughly fulfill its charge, including independent counsel and investigative teams, and there will be no restrictions placed on its scope or activities. Upon the completion of this investigation, a complete report will be presented at a future public session of the Board of Trustees.
Penn State has always strived for honesty, integrity and the highest moral standards in all of its programs. We will not tolerate any violation of these principles. We educate over 95,000 students every year and we take this responsibility very seriously. We are dedicated to protecting those who are placed in our care. We promise you that we are committed to restoring public trust in the University.
This statement is near-perfect for at least five reasons:
1. It prioritizes the victims. The board doesn’t come across as primarily self-interested, which offers a stark contrast to the tone of earlier statements released by School President Spanier and Head Coach Joe Paterno.
2. With this statement, the board aligned itself with the anger the public is expressing over this incident. As a result, the board has a chance of being seen as “good guys” in this story instead of being lumped in with those who clearly didn’t act quickly enough.
3. The statement uses real language, not the language of a statement written and vetted by fourteen attorneys. It uses non-hedging, raw, and evocative words such as “anger,” “terrible,” and “betrayed.”
4. The Board announced a specific plan to manage this crisis by creating a special committee which will be authorized to investigate this scandal without restriction. When a crisis strikes, the public wants to know that the organization in crisis has a plan to solve it; the board took an important step in that direction tonight.
5. The board released the statement quickly. Instead of letting this story simmer for several days or weeks, the school’s board took decisive, unwavering action within 48 hours of the story breaking.
Brad Phillips is the author of the Mr. Media Training Blog and president of Phillips Media Relations, which specializes in media and presentation training.