New federal audit probes ‘PR and propaganda’ spending

Some lawmakers are irked over a reported $2 billion expenditure in outside PR contracts while internal PR staff has increased. A study to address the issue is underway.

Ragan Insider Premium Content
Ragan Insider Content

A simple plan by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to hire Edelman, a private PR firm, is now making headlines.

The agency—which operates within the Department of Health and Human Services—has raised red flags about the amount of taxpayer dollars the government shells out for “PR, advertising and propaganda.” (Yes, that’s how the industry has been defined on Capitol Hill since 1949.) According to a post on FederalNewsRadio.com:

Federal law prohibits the use of appropriated federal funds for publicity or propaganda purposes, but as the Congressional Research Service report finds, no single agency tracks advertising spending for all federal agencies, and few government-wide restrictions exist that define legal advertising from prohibited propaganda.

Pandora’s box

To read the full story, log in.
Become a Ragan Insider member to read this article and all other archived content.
Sign up today

Already a member? Log in here.
Learn more about Ragan Insider.