Twitter disclaimers such as, "Views are my own and don't reflect the views of my employer," are a subject that divides opinion.
Some argue that they are an essential safeguard; others say they are meaningless. I'd go further and argue that for PR practitioners (and other
communications disciplines) such disclaimers are actually dangerous.
The disclaimer provides no protection whatsoever and can engender a false sense of security.
Such disclaimers don't provide legal protection. If you say something that you shouldn't, then having that little disclaimer won't save you from
disciplinary action or, if your comments are outrageous enough, from being sacked for gross misconduct.
The same goes for the disclaimer in your Twitter biography that reads, "Retweets don't imply endorsement or agreement." You are disseminating information,
and if it is libelous or inaccurate, then you can be held accountable.
However it isn't the legal aspect that makes these disclaimers not just wrong, but potentially dangerous. It's the practical reality of how most reasonable
people will view them—what the
man on the Clapham omnibus
will think (in UK law a hypothetical reasonable person).
Disclaimers don't work because:
1. Many people will never see them.
They will just see your tweet or retweet and never click through to your profile to see your biography and disclaimer.
2. People will inevitably associate what you say and what you do with your employer. This post isn't about debating the rights and wrongs of this. It's simply stating that it is the reality.
For anyone who can be considered the public face of an organization or company this is even truer. If you're a senior manager or director, a PR
practitioner, a politician, a company spokesperson, or something similar, then what you do and say directly affect both your employer's reputation and your
That means you've always got to be careful what you say.
If companies or organizations really want to protect themselves from reputational damage from what their employees say on social media, then a far better
solution than disclaimers is to implement proper social media policies and training. A good social media policy will make it easier for employees to use
social media safely, ultimately protecting both the employee and the employer.
Ragan's new distance-learning site houses the most comprehensive video training library for corporate communicators.]
There are countless examples of senior PR people, both in-house and at agencies, who tweet extensively without the need for disclaimers. A few friends and
acquaintances who correctly don't use disclaimers include:
Flip Dotsch, global corporate media relations, Unilever
Tom Murphy, global director of communications for Windows at Microsoft Corporation
Dom Burch, head of social, Walmart UK (Asda)
David Brain, CEO Asia/Pacific/Middle East/Africa, Edelman
Stephen Waddington, digital and social media director, Ketchum and 2014 president of the CIPR
Stephen Davies, director of digital health Europe, Weber Shandwick
All these in-house and PR agency experts have excellent Twitter accounts that mix the personal with the professional.
I'll give the last word to Tom Murphy who wrote a far pithier
post on Twitter disclaimers.
Footnote (and my own disclaimer)
The current guidance from the Chartered Institute of Public Relations (to be fully transparent I'm a founder member of and sit on the CIPR's Social Media
Panel which produced these guidelines) in its
Social Media Best Practice Guide
fudges the issue and says:
Stuart Bruce is a UK-based international PR adviser and trainer.
A version of this article first appeared on
Stuart Bruce's PR Guy's Musings.
For example, it can be advisable to add a "views are my own" disclaimer to a Twitter biography, if a practitioner tweets about client and industry related
news / opinions, [professional] and also shares their personal views on a subject that lies outside of their work remit [personal], through the same
However, practitioners should be aware that this will not remove the risk of association with an employer, potentially damaging their reputation, and that
adding this to a profile has no legal standing in the UK.