PR industry must ‘consign AVE to the graveyard’

In response to an article published this week on PR Daily, a measurement expert calls us to task and roundly rejects the notion of ad value equivalency (AVE).

I was extremely irritated by a recent piece published here on PR Daily, justifying ad value equivalency (AVE) as a valid public relations metric.

I mean, what the fried fish is PR Daily doing publishing a piece like this?!

I was so irritated that I tweeted publisher Mark Ragan about it … who, to his credit, invited me to write a point-by-point rebuttal post for PR Daily.

If you haven’t already seen it, Chuck Hemann has already done an excellent rebuttal post (so go and read it). And there are some outstanding comments on the original post, notably from Sean Williams and Mark Weiner.

So instead of repeating their arguments, here are a few additional points (quoting from the original post, with my reactions italicized):

1. “Editorial is third-party opinion, so the impact is considered three times that of a paid advertisement.”

To read the full story, log in.
Become a Ragan Insider member to read this article and all other archived content.
Sign up today

Already a member? Log in here.
Learn more about Ragan Insider.