How audiences feel about Hispanic Heritage Month campaigns
A survey of more than 1,000 people on how the campaigns landed.
How are people responding to brands’ HHM campaigns overall? What impact are they having for brands? Or for the Hispanic communities they’re intended to support?
We’re in an industry of self-deprecating know-it-alls who tend to criticize our own work as intensely as we praise it, but we tried to go into this with open minds. Is it possible that for all the perennial, headline-making backlash against specific HHM-themed efforts — this year’s notable entries include the Mexican Week on Great British Bake-Off and the NFL’s cringe Por La Cultura Campaign — heritage months really are doing some good these days? We surveyed over 1,000 people* in late September to find out.
As you might expect, the reactions were mixed, but three themes came through…
Finding #1: Brands’ heritage month efforts are seen as good for inclusion
We started with a basic question: When brands celebrate heritage or history months, are they helping promote a more inclusive society?
Become a Ragan Insider member to read this article and all other archived content.
Sign up today
Already a member? Log in here.
Learn more about Ragan Insider.